Friday, September 5, 2025

What did the Canadian militia wear?/ Que portait la milice canadienne?

 


This is an attempt to combine the best known first person quotes and contemporary artwork depicting French Canadian milice and civilian men in general during the period of the Seven Years War in America, approximately 1754-1763.


One of the few images of Canadian men and women in our era is The Votive of the Shipwreck at Lévis,1754. 


 Votive of the Shipwreck at Lévis, anonymous, 1754, oil on wood panel, 32.4 x 52.1 cm (courtesy Musée Historical, Basilique Sainte-Anne).

https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/votive-painting


The men and women in this image  wear exemplary clothing from the era. Note that European and Canadian men, like their Indigenous counterparts, were clean shaven. It would not be fashionable to wear any kind of facial hair in the region for another century. 


The basic clothing for men from head to toe began with the toque, a red knit cap. Three quotes which speak to the commonality of the toque in new France compiled by Jeff Pavlik are: 


“Most of them wear red woolen caps at home and sometimes on their journey.” 

Pehr Kalm, Canada, 1749


“All Canadians speak the same French we do. Except for some typical words,…they have forged some such as tuque or fourole to name a cap of red wool.” 

Jean-Baptiste d’Alcyrac, Canada, 1755-60 


“ worn by such of the Canadians…a large, red, milled worsted cap.” 

Alexander Henry (Elder), Lake Huron, 1761


 A shirt of natural linen or cotton , a neckerchief commonly of silk or cotton tied around the neck with layers of gilet- sleeved Or unsleeved vests cut straight across at the waist, over that a mantlet or sleeved waistcoat reaching to mid thigh with breeches, stockings and shoes which could be European style lasted shoes, ox hide soliers de beouf or moccasins. Not shown in this image was the hooded capote worn universally by French Canadian men well into and beyond the 19th century. 




In the votive at Lévis it is difficult to discern if the man on the left has no hat and his hair is depicted or if he is possibly wearing a kerchief tied around his head. He is clean shaven. He wears a red justacorps , a commonly styled coat,lined in white over a yellow mantlet. He has a black kerchief tied around his neck over a white shirt collar. His ruffled shirt cuffs or perhaps just the bulk of his shirtsleeves pokes out from under his justacorps sleeves. He wears light gray or white breeches, white stockings and black shoes-likely typical European style shoes of the time period. 



The man on the right is clean shaven. He wears a red toque on his head. He may have a white handkerchief tied around his neck or it may be that his outer garment is open and the white shirt shows underneath. The gray or white upper body garment he wears is probably some sort of camesole. A gilet-like garment typically worn under other outer garments but the front is constructed of one solid piece instead of being a vest that buttons. Instead the top opens and closes with just four buttons at the neck. He wears brown breeches. He may be in just his black stockings, his shoes having been taken by the water, or he could be wearing black stockings and black shoes. 


 Drawn by Richard Short, engraved by James Mason. Vue de l'orphelinat ou du couvent des Ursulines, depuis les Remparts. Signed:L. c. below image, Drawn on the SPOT by R. Short Engraved by James Mason; b. c., Sep.r 1st, 1761, Published according to Act of Parliament by R. Short...ink, watercolor, laid paper, public domain. https://collections.musee-mccord-stewart.ca/fr/objects/39648/a-view-of-the-orphans-or-urseline-nunnery-taken-from-the-r?ctx=9e9d71055d6187595237b78b2c99f4ec116e6ab8&idx=3 


In this engraving by Short and Mason we can see typical, common, Canadian clothing. These are inhabitants of Quebec City. Although 1761 is at the end of the scope of our study the general Canadian way of dress held consistencies over time since the early 18th century. 


Detail Short and Mason. In this image we see a typical Canadian Family. The man is clean shaven. He wears a toque, mantlet, breeches, stockings and shoes. Probably either soliers de beouf or lasted shoes. The woman wears a cap, the collar and cuffs of her mantlet reveal the edges of her shift, her petticoats are topped by an apron. She wears European style shoes.the child wears a gown which was common for both boys and girls in Europe and New France until the age of potty training was reached and boys would wear breeches and girls would wear petticoats like adults typically between ages 2 to 8. 


Detail Short and Mason. This couple and their dog are likewise typically dressed. The seated woman wears a cap and fichu, a mantlet apron and petticoats complete the ensemble. The gentleman appears to be bare headed with short shorn hair. He is clean shaven. He wears a sleeved gilet or a short mantlet. He wears breeches with stockings and shoes. 


 ex-voto Notre-Dame-de-Liesse Rivière-Ouelle

Probably 1745, oil, anynomous. 


One of the few images from the period showing French Canadian men wearing what can only be described as capotes is  the ex-voto Notre-Dame-de-Liesse Rivière-Ouelle which resides in a remote church in Quebec. Another benefit of this painting is that it depicts hunters. 

Explained well in a radio Canada article ;“The story told by Father Casgrain, it would be in fact that these three characters would have lost their way in the forest during the winter, following a compass which would have been inadvertently dropped in the snow. The two companions of the young man in prayer would have ended up freezing to death, and one of the two companions would have been his father. [This one] would have recommended to his son to invoke the good Blessed Virgin to be saved miraculously, by making the commitment precisely to offer an ex-voto if ever his prayer was answered, tells Claude La Charité, professor of history literary at the University of Quebec at Rimouski.”

https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/1351749/notre-dame-liesse-anonyme-peinture-ex-voto-nouvelle-france


The three men have long hair worn loose and are clean shaven. They wear black handkerchiefs tied around their necks, sleeved mantlet, breeches, leggings, moccasins, with capotes on top. These men are probably upper class if they could have an ex Voto painting commissioned for the church. Their capotes have deep boot cuffs characteristic of the first half of the 18th century and are well tailored with pleated side vents. They wear sashes to close the double breasted capotes that appear to be fingerwoven sashes of indigenous make. 

Once again due to her supernatural representation, Mary the mother of Jesus is exempt from our historical discussion. 


Detail of ex-voto Notre-Dame-de-Liesse Rivière-Ouelle.


In addition to what was mentioned above one written example stands out in particular and tells us a lot about what was considered publicly appropriate. Orders to milita captains by Monsieur de Noyan at the request of  the parish priest of Varennes, 1756 ; “(do not) let any militiaman come [to a religious procession] wearing only a mantelet and a tuque, when they are certain that these people have capots and hats at home.”


P.J. Miller’s attempt at recreating the contrast in dress that Monsieur de Noyan’s orders highlighted about appropriate clothing at a religious procession for milicean. Photo Credit Amanda Miller. 


The capote was essential in the harsh Canadian winter and as a reenactor I can attest that it is not a garment I enjoy wearing in any other season. It is likely that by “hat” a felt cocked hat was intended. Again in my experience they are an impractical and cumbersome garment.


Speaking of French Canadians generally in 1749 Swedish naturalist Pehr Kalm observed: 

“Many nations imitate the French customs; yet I observed, on the contrary, that the French in Canada, in many respects, follow the customs of the Indians, with whom they converse everyday. They make use of the tobacco pipes, shoes, garters, and girdles of the Indians.” 


“Canadiens on the warpath or traveling for the fur trade adopted the breechclout of the Natives very early on to replace the cumbersome breeches… The shirt being quite long, the breechclout would completely disappear under it. Which may explain the fuss made by Bishop Saint-Vallier in 1719. Answering a complaint from local priests as he was just returning from France, Saint-Vallier was upset that his flock was going to work in the fields “with only their shirts on, wearing no breeches and no underpants during the summer in order to alleviate the heat.” This quote from the Gousse siblings in Costume in New France sums up the working, traveling, and fighting summer dress for Canadian men in New France. 


The clothing provided to milicean by the French monarchy was essentially the clothing they would have chosen to wear anyway. d’Aleyrac, 1755-60 explained exactly what they were given “Those who go to war receive a capot, two cotton shirts, one breechclout, one pair of leggings, one blanket, one pair of souliers de boeuf, a wood-handled knife, a worm and a musket when they do not bring any. The breechclout is a piece of broadcloth draped between the thighs in the Native manner and with the two ends held by a belt. One wears it without breeches to walk more easily in the woods.” 

Pierre Pouchot described their look this way;“…about sixty militiamen with a kerchief on their heads and wearing shirts and their backsides bare in the Canadian style.” 


Anonymous, Habillement des Coureurs de bois Canadiens, no. 2, drawing, ca. 1730?, Yale University Library, https://collections.library.yale.edu/catalog/2001154


The image of the Habillement des Coureurs de bois Canadiens, exemplifies the unique Canadian style described through the time period. Not Milicean  but someone with all the same skills. There has been much written about Coureurs de bois but in short; they were Canadian men who were voyageurs in business for themselves woth no permissions or liscenced to trade goods for furs. It is either one person from three views or three people in one view. Each figure wears a double breasted capote which has simple buttoned slashed sleeves, tied shut with a sash and slit pouches suspended from them, they have shirts on beneath the capotes, two have no leggings or shoes and the one with the hood up on the far left wears leggings and moccasins. 


This valuable image also shows Canadians smoking tobacco.

 Smoking tobacco was commonplace for women and men in French and Native communities alike. Stone indigenous type and clay European pipes were both used. 

Jean Babtiste de Aleyrac describes Canadian habits: 

“The Canadians have an extreme passion for brandy and smoking tobacco. It is a home practice to drink a big shot of brandy when waking up, and the same for ladies. The men smoke a black stone calumet. The children of seven or eight years drink and smoke the same. A bottle of Brandy is done in a single sitting. With wine we do not make such debauchery. But one spends the whole day smoking; many have the habit of smoking in bed.”



Stone pipe bowl or calumet in French. In Ticonderoga's Collections: An Introduction 

https://fortticonderoga.pastperfectonline.com/webobject/59B49D80-4685-4F01-9FD0-464430583009


These Native style pipe bowls would have had wooden stems made from pithy local wood like sumac. Natives and Canadians manufactured such pipes at home.


Tattooing was also common for those French Canadians who were engaged as workers in the fur trade called voyageurs. Especially those who wintered over in western trading posts where the indigenous population was higher than in the East. It is likely that Indigenous cultural influence and a desire to have their bodies easily identified if they were to drown while working contributed to this adoption of tattooing for this specific social class. 

In October 8, 1758  Louis-Antoine, Comte de Bougainville, aide de camp to the Marquis de Montcalm overall commander of French Forces in Canada described the Canadians arriving at Carillon {Known today as Fort Ticonderoga};

”…950 Canadians, and this detachment is composed of the good kind, almost all voyageurs. One recognizes them easily by their looks, by their size, and because all of them are tattooed on their bodies with figures of plants or animals. The operation is long and painful. The figure is outlined by pricking the skin with a needle and printed in by burning powder in the holes. One would not pass for a man among the Indians of the Far West if he had not had himself tattooed.” In other accounts tattoos of the body are mentioned but there are no accounts of Canadians with facial tattoos.


J.B. Scotin, Canadians in snowshoes going to war in the snow, 1 print: engraving on laid paper 1722

Finally, perhaps the most important image in our study. This is an image actually of a Canadian militiaman and is dated to 1722 by the Canadian Archives. Excepting the “tapaboard” style cloth hat this man is dressed exactly as the “courior de bois” pictured above. Capote, shirt, leggings and Moccicans. Note in each picture the men are equipped with small pouches and tomahawks suspend from their sashes. 


Further reading


B., J.-C, and Andrew Gallup. Memoir of a French and Indian War Soldier. Westminster, MD: Heritage Books, 2007. 


Bartram, John, and Pehr Kalm. Observations on the Inhabitants, Climate, Soil, Rivers, Productions, Animals, and Other Matters Worthy of Notice Made by Mr. John Bartram, in His Travels from Pensilvania Sic to Onondago, Oswego and the Lake Ontario, in Canada: To Which Is Annex'd a Curious Account of the Cataracts at Niagara by Mr. Peter Kalm, a Swedish Gentleman Who Travelled There. London: J. Whiston & B. White, 1751.


Bougainville, Louis-Antoine de, and Edward Pierce Hamilton. Adventure in the Wilderness: the American Journals of Louis Antoine De Bougainville, 1756-1760. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1990.


Colonialbaker.net


Francis Millville-Deschênes, The Soldier Off Duty, Parks Canada 1987 1-111 http://www.parkscanadahistory.com/series/saah/soldieroffduty.pdf


Gousse, Suzanne, and André Gousse. Costume in New France from 1740 to 1760: A Visual Dictionary. Chambly, Québec: Fleur de Lyse, 1998. 


Misty May Jackson, Classifications by Historical Archeologists and Eighteenth Century Montreal Merchants and Military Personnel in New France: Emic and Etic Approaches posted to Academia.edu, Academia. June 3rd 2021. https://www.academia.edu/33232515/CLASSIFICATIONS_BY_HISTORICAL_ARCHAEOLOGISTS_AND_EIGHTEENTH_CENTURY_MONTREAL_MERCHANTS_AND_MILITARY_PERSONNEL_IN_NEW_FRANCE_EMIC_AND_ETIC_APPROACHES


Pierre Pouchot. Memoirs on the Late War in North America between France and England 2004 ed. 


https://sites.google.com/view/livinginhistory/french-in-wisconsin-archives


Steve Delisle.  The equipment of New France Militia 1740-1760. Bel-Air MD.:Kebecca Liber Ata Company, 1999

Monday, April 28, 2025

The Cross/ La Croix

 These days, I'm sometimes unsure if my intense interests are just personality quirks or lean towards the pathological. Occasionally, a topic, an item, or an activity gets stuck in my head like a song. I find myself obsessing over it until I take some action that scratches the itch. This tendency often leads me down deep research rabbit holes, sometimes hitting dead ends or resulting in failed projects. Other times, I realize I don’t actually need a new hobby or skill set right now. But occasionally, these obsessions result in some of my favorite historical reproductions or recipes.

Recently, one such interest led me to images of brass (and what appears to be copper) and silver crosses dating to the 18th century, found at the sites Fort St. Joseph Michigan. I've seen reproductions of these cross forms before, but I don't personally own any. While my search has been somewhat limited, I haven't yet found analogous forms specifically from the Northeast, although my personal collection of photos featuring trade-related artifacts from research and museum visits is fairly extensive.


These simple crosses are fascinating items within the context of New France. They aren't as immediately recognizable as overtly Catholic symbols like the classic crucifix, saint's medallion, or devotional ring. However, they are decidedly Catholic items, frequently found in and around French sites in North America during a period when New France was, for all intents and purposes, exclusively Catholic. In my opinion, these crosses often display more abstract ornamentation than crucifixes, perhaps because the basic cross shape itself is simpler and lends itself to decorative interpretation. In contrast, a crucifix, while intrinsically more detailed, focuses that detail on the figure of Christ, often emphasizing aspects meant to inspire devotion, such as portraying suffering for the faithful and potential converts.

Historically, these crosses served practical purposes in trade and gift-giving, particularly for missionary priests seeking to help new converts display their religious allegiance and subtly signal the faith to others. Distributing small gifts like crosses, rosaries, and other devotional tools is a practice the Catholic Church still employs today. Though not Catholic myself, I sometimes collect similar items as souvenirs to commemorate visits to historic Catholic institutions. There's perhaps a psychological element at play; receiving a gift, even a small, inexpensive one, seems to solidify the memory of an experience.

Beyond missionary efforts, these crosses could also have been sold or traded among European-descended populations, such as French soldiers and local Canadiens. Crosses held significance for both Indigenous and Franco-Canadian faithful as devotional tools and visible social signifiers of faith – important ways for people in that era to build social capital and community standing.

Artifact photos courtesy of the Fort Ouiatenon Facebook page 

While I've encountered photos of these crosses periodically, finding images with a clear scale proved difficult. Most appear to be relatively small, generally under an inch in length and width, though variations exist. To my eye, they look like they were cut from sheet silver, brass, or possibly copper using saws, and then refined with files. At least one cross from Fort Oniention Illinois might have been punched or cut from brass, possibly using chisels and hammers, or perhaps even sturdy scissors or snips – similar to how I suspect the accompanying "Thunderbird" form pendant was created, shown on the cover of  "A Pictorial History of fur Trade Goods Mid 1600’s to Early 1800’s in the Mackinac Straights Area" by Robert Bennett.

The book cover "Thunderbird", a similarly possible devotional item to Indigenous religion. (I use the word thunderbird in quotations because this designation for various bird motifs is possibly incorrect and may be too wide of a generalization from commentators on the subject.)


 Crucifixes from the period, conversely, seem typically to have been cast from silver, brass, bronze, or lead, then refined and polished with files and other tools. 




It's conceivable these simpler crosses were also cast, perhaps very thinly, and then polished, much like the crucifixes. However, I haven't found definitive scholarly research or detailed speculation outlining their exact creation method, nor have I yet contacted artisans who currently reproduce these items to learn about their techniques.


Cutting such intricate, wavy shapes from sheet metal with snips or chisels seems challenging. Although I'm by no means an experienced metalworker, my own attempts to cut or punch such a pattern from sheet metal proved difficult, causing warping and crimping. I used relatively thin sheet metal (under 20 gauge), which might have contributed, but I suspect thicker metal would present similar difficulties without specialized tools or techniques.
Feeling rather daunted by the complexity of the more ornate examples, a particularly small, simpler cross documented from Oniention caught my eye. Its relatively angular form seemed more achievable, despite its tiny size. Thankfully, I located an image showing it next to a ruler for scale. 


Unfortunately, the material of the original artifact is unclear, though brass, especially salvaged from cast-off kettles and utensils, was a common scrap material in New France.
By matching a physical ruler to the scaled image on my screen, I could trace its actual-size outline onto plastic wrap placed over my phone. I then transferred the outline to a piece of sheet brass by rubbing the ink side of the plastic wrap onto the metal. Not a period technique but it works. Using basic tin snips, I was able to cut out the rough shape and then refine it with simple files.


The intended purpose or original state of this small, angular cross remains unknown, as the artifact fragment shows no apparent hole or other attachment method. It's possible the piece is incomplete, perhaps cut or broken. I surmise it might originally have had a suspension hole punched at the top, similar to the larger, wavier crosses and was broken or is an unfinished piece. 

This is my theoretical representation of how the cross may have appeared if finished or whole if it was broken.

It's also possible this very small cross represents local Indigenous or Canadien craftsmanship. Since, as my experiment showed, its simpler form can be cut from sheet metal using basic tools like snips or chisels, the small size might suggest a careful conservation of material, hinting at local production rather than European mass manufacture specifically for the trade market.

My dive into these 18th-century crosses began as a personal quest to understand an object that caught my eye and ended with a small brass reproduction in my hand. While this hands-on experiment gave me a new appreciation for the potential skill involved, it also highlighted how much I don’t know about their precise manufacture and the stories behind specific examples, like the tiny, hole-less cross from Fort Ouiatenon. Was it a broken piece, a local creation, or something else entirely? These questions persist, but the process of investigation and replication has forged a tangible link to the past, transforming abstract curiosity into a deeper appreciation for these small, yet significant, artifacts of New France.





What did the Canadian militia wear?/ Que portait la milice canadienne?

  This is an attempt to combine the best known first person quotes and contemporary artwork depicting French Canadian milice and civilian me...